US judge blocks Trump limits to Medicaid work requirement exceptions

SHARE NOW

By Nate Raymond

Oct 29 (Reuters) – A federal judge on Thursday blocked US President Donald Trump’s administration from enforcing a rule that would narrow exceptions to new work requirements for Medicaid recipients with serious medical conditions.

US District Judge Richard Stearns in Boston sided with 25 states and the District of Columbia, which had argued that the new rule would force medically frail people to clear unnecessary hurdles to maintain government-funded health insurance coverage.

The US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the agency that adopted the rule, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Medicaid, the US government health insurance program for low-income Americans, is jointly funded by the federal and state governments.

CMS issued the rule in June in order to implement work requirements for Medicaid that were enacted as part of Trump’s signature tax and spending measure, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which he signed into law last year.

The law requires adults aged 19-64, with a few exceptions, to complete a minimum of 80 hours of work or community engagement activities per month or be enrolled in an education program at least half time to qualify for Medicaid beginning January 1, 2027.

CMS’s rule provided guidance to states on how to implement the work requirements, including the law’s exemptions for individuals who are “medically frail or otherwise have special medical needs.”

But Stearns said CMS’s rule unlawfully limited who qualifies as “medically frail” by dictating that the exemption only applies if someone’s “physical, mental, or other behavioral health condition significantly impairs the individual’s ability to comply with the community engagement requirement.”

“Because enforcement of an unlawful definition of ‘medically frail’ may lead to the disenrollment of otherwise eligible vulnerable individuals relying on Medicaid coverage for continuity of care, the States (and public) face potential for great hardship in the absence of an injunction,” Stearns wrote.

The judge was appointed by former President Bill Clinton, a Democrat. While he invalidated that part of the rule, he upheld other provisions that Democratic-led states had also challenged.

Among those states were California, Massachusetts and New Jersey, whose attorneys general led the legal challenge.

(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by David Gregorio)

Brought to you by www.srnnews.com