CNN, MS NOW, Politico sue over denied White House access

SHARE NOW

(SRN NEWS) – President Donald Trump’s battle with major news organizations is now headed to federal court.

CNN, MS NOW, and Politico filed a joint lawsuit Monday after the White House blocked their reporters from the grounds and disabled or confiscated their press credentials. The outlets argue that the administration violated the First Amendment by targeting them over coverage President Trump considers false or unfair.

The White House has not issued a formal response to the lawsuit. But President Trump says the administration is not attacking the free press. In a statement on Truth Social, Trump said he “cherished” a free press, while arguing that the White House has a responsibility to confront what he calls “fake news.”

Trump says the problem is not criticism of his administration. Instead, he argues that certain outlets have engaged in what he describes as coordinated, dishonest, and politically motivated reporting designed to damage the president and the Republican Party.

The president has repeatedly criticized CNN, MS NOW, Politico, and other national news organizations, accusing them of emphasizing negative stories while minimizing accomplishments by his administration.

The restrictions began over the weekend. CNN reporter Betsy Klein, MS NOW reporter Akayla Gardner, and Politico reporter Cheyenne Haslett were denied access to the White House. Their credentials were disabled, and in some cases reporters were told to surrender their badges.

The three organizations say the White House acted without notice or a hearing and punished them simply because President Trump disliked their coverage.

Their lawsuit describes the move as “viewpoint discrimination,” meaning the government is accused of treating media organizations differently because of what they report or publish.

The White House Correspondents’ Association has called for the reporters’ access to be restored. Its president, Jacqui Heinrich, warned that a standard used against one outlet could eventually be used against any news organization.

The dispute has also disrupted television coverage of the presidency. CNN had been scheduled to participate in the television pool covering Trump’s trip to New York for the United Nations General Assembly. But after CNN was removed from its assigned duties, the other major networks announced that the pool would not provide replacement coverage.

That means there could be no shared television camera accompanying the president during official events a change that could limit the public’s immediate access to presidential appearances.

From the administration’s perspective, the dispute is part of a broader effort to challenge what Trump and many of his supporters view as a deeply biased media establishment. The president argues that news organizations should not receive special access while using that access to publish what he considers deliberate falsehoods.

Critics respond that the government cannot decide which reporters are acceptable based on favorable coverage.

The case has been assigned to U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, a Trump appointee. The legal fight will test how far a president can go in controlling access to the White House while preserving the constitutional protections guaranteed to the press.

For now, the administration says it is fighting misinformation. The news organizations say they are defending the First Amendment. The courts will now decide whether the White House crossed the line.

This combination of photos shows MS NOW White House reporter Akayla Gardne, from left, CNN Senior White House Reporter Betsy Klein and Politico White House reporter Cheyenne Haslett near the White House complex after all were denied entry to the White House and had credentials confiscated following President Donald Trump’s ban on CNN, MS NOW and Politico, Saturday, Sept. 19, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photos/Jose Luis Magana)

Brought to you by www.srnnews.com